A New Status for the American Indian


On March 23, 1957, the Oregon Historical Society held its Third Annual Historical Forum, a discussion of events that had influenced Oregon’s political, social, cultural, and natural environment.  “A New Status for the American Indian: Can He Achieve It?” was a historical discussion of the Klamath Termination Act of 1954, which terminated federal recognition of the Klamath Tribes, discontinued supplemental human services, and stripped tribal rights to 1.8 million acres of land.

Don C. Foster, Area Director of the Office of Indian Affairs, represented the Federal Government and asserted that the Treaty of 1864, which created the Klamath Reservation, did not “indicate that the Federal Government…has any responsibility other than the trusteeship of the reservation.”  “[O]ur Indian people,” Foster criticized, “have lost [their] pride,” and, he concluded, “[T]hese folks are just simply going to have to grow up and…face life realistically…”  Hiroto Zakoji, Director of the Klamath Adult Indian Education and Training Program and representing the State of Oregon, emphasized at the forum that termination should ultimately “help the Indian people without destroying their native culture or values and patterns of living….”  University of Oregon Anthropologist Theodore Stern discussed how termination would end special privileges awarded the Klamath Tribes, such as private hospitals, schools, and tax-free income.  Stern, however, was concerned about the overall administration of the policy and whether it would be successful.

Mrs. Henry Roe Cloud of the National Congress of American Indians shared with the audience a conversation she recently had had with a U.S. Senator.  “I had met this distinguished Senator many times….  He turned to me and said, ‘Well, Mrs. Roe Cloud, what are you doing here?  Don’t you want to be assimilated?  Don’t you want to be integrated?  Don’t you want to have your freedom?  Don’t you want education?’”  “As to assimilation,” Mrs. Roe Cloud explained to the Senator, “I just love being an Indian.  And, as to integration, I think I’m already integrated—maybe too much so.  And freedom…most of us have more freedom than we can possibly handle.  And thirdly, I feel that I have some measure of education.”  Mrs. Roe Cloud concluded by stressing that Native Americans wanted a voice in their own affairs, to assume responsibility for their own actions, and to participate in decisions that would affect their lives and future.  In 1986, Congress reestablished the Klamath Reservation.  By then, however, most of the tribal lands had been incorporated into the Winema National Forest.

Further Reading:
Haynal, Patrick. “Termination and Tribal Survival: The Klamath Tribes of Oregon.” Oregon Historical Quarterly, 101, 2000: 270-301.

Written by Robert Donnelly, © Oregon Historical Society, 2003


Map It


Related Historical Records

Klamath Indian Reservation // General Land Office Oregon 1879
Klamath Indian Reservation

When white explorers entered the Klamath Basin in the 1820s, the Klamath Indians occupied the Upper Klamath Lake area, which included Klamath Marsh and the Sprague and Williamson rivers.  The Modoc people inhabited the Tule Lake area of Northern California and Southern Oregon.  Yahooskin land bordered Klamath territory to the …

Klamath Tribal Council, 1955 // CN 012356
Klamath Tribal Council, 1955

To some Klamath Tribal members, which included Klamath, Modoc, and Yahooskin Indians, the reservation symbolized subservience to Anglo-American society, and for greater than 70 years, the reservation had altered the tribes’ way of life.  The educational system administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs suppressed the use of their native …

News Article, Klamath Indians Draw Spotlight
News Article, Klamath Indians Draw Spotlight

This newspaper article describes some of the early debates over the termination of southern Oregon’s Klamath Tribes. The complex politicking reported in this piece went on until 1954, when the U.S. Congress passed the Klamath Termination Act.

Termination can be defined as the annulment of treaty agreements between the United …

Traditional Klamath Crafts // P 2-24
Traditional Klamath Crafts

This photograph of Priscilla H. Bettles (left) and her grand daughter, Priscilla Witcraft (right), posing with their newly fashioned cradleboards, was taken by Folklife director Nancy Nusz on June 13, 1991. At the time, Bettles was teaching her grand daughter how to make the cradleboards through the Traditional Arts Apprenticeship …

Related Oregon Encyclopedia Articles


This entry was last updated on March 17, 2018